A Sleb Denounces EU Referendum As A Tory Sleb Game Show
Greg Lance – Watkins
Friday 18 March 2016
Finding its way into the Shropshire Star and other papers, including the Mail online is an agency report of a clip from BBC Radio 4’s Today Programmeinterviewing Oscar-winning actor Jeremy Irons.
This 67-year-old actor (the same age as myself) and, unlike me, previously a Labour Party donor, told the programme of his “disillusionment with politics”. And on the EU referendum, he complained that David Cameron and Boris Johnson were making a “game show” out of it, failing to respect us as voters.
This latter comment, we would like to think, is very significant – and certainly sufficiently so for a number of papers to carry it. However, you have to give them nil points for self-awareness. In order to address the issue of the referendum being turned into a celeb-style game show, they have to find a sleb to put the boot in.
However, the point is made: there is by no means universal approval of intervention of Mr Johnson in the referendum campaign. Typically though, the resultant degeneration into a “game show” is attributed to the politicians concerned. No mention is made of the enthusiasm of the media for this development, allowing them to focus on personalities rather than the issues.
In transforming the media coverage, though, Mr Johnson’s intervention does present real problems for campaigners, and especially leave campaigners. Some regard his high-profile presence as a good thing, giving the leavers “star” quality, but the actual effect is – as Irons complains – to turn this into a personal clash between “Boris and Dave”.
What Johnson supporters don’t realise, though, is that the currency of this contest is prestige – which makes for a very unequal match. The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, against “Bumbling Boris” will win every time. People (some people) may like “Boris” for his entertainment value, but voters in the actual polling booth will think differently.
If then the contest is between two individuals, then we have moved away from an issue-based contest – a competition between ideas – and have entered the territory we didn’t want to be in. The debate, such that it is, has become dominated by the “he says – she says” dynamic.
As such, facts don’t get a look in. The Prime Minister on the one hand, is building his case on a foundation of lies while Mr Johnson, lacking anything substantive, is making it up as he goes along – neither bears any relation to reality.
Since this is now personal, the only way this can be successfully deal with is at a personal level – playing the man rather than the ball. The Prime Ministers, relying on the prestige conferred on him as holder of the highest political office in the land, must be transformed into “Dodgy Dave”, the political chancer, trying to pull a fast one over the British public.
This means confronting Mr Cameron’s lies – and in particular his fictitious treaty that he has supposedly brought back from Brussels – and branding its author a liar. Only then can his claims be discounted.
For the leavers, though, this is not enough. That we are able to discredit “Dave’s Dodgy Deal” cannot be treated as sufficient to motivate a majority to vote to leave the EU. As we have said so many times, we must offer a credible alternative and then we must be able to reassure voters that this alternative is safe and achievable.
It is here that Mr Johnson becomes a real problem. Unable to offer a credible alternative, much less reassure voters that it is safe and achievable, his residual prestige is sufficient to have him being seen as representing the entire leave campaign.
That then puts us in a position of having to discredit and then disown Mr Johnson. Again, facts don’t get a look in, No more than Mr Cameron does Johnson trade in facts. People believe what he says because it is him saying it, not because of its intrinsic merits.
Once again, therefore, it is personal. Boris the “blond bombshell” and next leader of the Conservative Party, de facto leader of the “leave” campaign, is listened to. Boris the “idiot”, making it up as he goes along, can be discounted.
Effectively, only when we have cleared out the rubbish can we get down to discussing the issues – something neither the politicians nor the media want to do. Nor indeed are the main campaign noise-makers at all interested in the key issues, offering the alternative and convincing reassurance.
And it is clearly here where we have our main problem. Discussing the issues at this time, or jousting with the “remain” campaign, is a complete waste of time. The priority must be the neutralisation of the “Boris and Dave show”, by whatever means necessary.
This is where I stand, even though I am aware that this is a highly contentious issue among our own supporters. Much as I would like this to be a gentle and polite debate about the issues, conducted according to the rules between equals, this is not going to happen.
Mr Cameron and his supporters are already breaking the rules, lying freely and frequently to make their case. On the other hand, Vote Leave has its own agenda which seems to have precious little to do with winning the referendum. Being good little gentlemen simply isn’t going to cut it. We are in a fight to the death, with no holds barred.
Of course, there are those who want to sit on the sidelines and keep their hands clean, parading their moral superiority over those who are getting stuck into the fight.
There are the Tory Boys of Vote Leave who regard the campaign as their personal property, there is the “GO” movement, the main function of which is to provide a playground for Farage and a dysfunctional group of Tory “eurosceptics”, and then there is Mr Banks’s increasingly irrelevant Leave.eu which doesn’t really seem to know what it wants.
To cut through all this dead wood and engage the real enemy is going to take the most extraordinary effort – and some of the responses on my own comment threads over the last few days makes me wonder if we’re up for it. In a dirty, deadly fight, the determination by some to keep to the supposed moral high ground would mean we make no impact whatsoever.
In dealing with real people, on real issues, fighting against unprincipled liars on both sides – and those who are prepared to break every rule in the book – we have to be focused and ruthless. Worrying about our image or listening to prissy hypocrites telling us we are being aggressive is simply an unwanted distraction.
If we are going to win, we are going to have to get up close and personal – taking no prisoners. Nobody gets to win and keep their hands clean.
To view the original of this article CLICK HERE
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
With an avg. 1.2M voters per MEP & Britain having only 8%, if united, say. The EUropean Parliament has no ability to make policy and has a Commission of unelected bureaucrats, thus clearly the EU is not even a pretence of being a democracy; yet The EU & many of its vassal States are willing to slaughter people in Sovereign States to impose The EU’s chosen brand of democracy on them!
The imposition of a Government and policies upon its vassal regions such as the peoples of Greece shows just how far from being a democracy the EU is.
There will be little or no change in Britain’s economic position, when we leave the EU, using a better negotiated & updated version of the ‘Norway Model’ as a stepping stone to becoming a full member of the Eropean Economic Area, where all will benefit, as we secure trade relations with the EU’s vassal regions, with an EFTA style status and can trade and negotiate independently on the global stage, as members of The Commonwealth and the Anglosphere.One huge benefit will be that we can negotiate with bodies like the WTO, UN, WHO, IMF, CODEX and the like, directly in our own interest and that of our partners around the world in both the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere at large; rather than having negotiations and term imposed by unelected EU bureacrats and their ionterpretation of the rules handed down as if they were some great achievement by the EU.The greatest change and benefit will be political, as we improve our democracy and self determination, with the ability to deselect and elect our own Government, with an improved Westminster structure, see >Harrogate Agenda<.
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Documents, Essays & Treaties: https://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com/
The Hamlet of Stroat: http://Stroat-Gloucestershire.com
The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com
Chepstow Chat: http://ChepstowChat.wordpress.com/
Christopher Storey: http://ChristopherStory.wordpress.com/
Des Watkins DFC: http://DesWatkins.wordpress.com/
Hollie Greig etc.: http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com/
The McCann Case: http://TheMcCannCase.wordpress.com/
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: http://SSOE.wordpress.com/
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: http://StolenKids-Dunblane.blogspot.com/
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.co.uk/
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
Re-TWEET my Twitterings