Osborne’s Treasury Spin – Gove – @ ConservativeHome
Greg Lance – Watkins
The Government document setting out its case for remaining in the EU was a waste of £9 million of taxpayers’ money and a breach of its undertaking not to use mailshots to load the referendum dice – in spirit, anyway. But much of the content of it was sober enough. The same cannot be said of yesterday’s Treasury document fronted by George Osborne. (And produced, as Full Fact notes, “by civil servants whose salaries you pay.”)
As Fraser Nelson has written, it calculated that incomes will rise if we leave the EU, not fall, though one would not have known this from the Chancellor’s presentation. But as Allister Heath and Andrew Lilico have said, there is no basis for believing that they would increase in the relatively slow way that the publication predicts. This is because it simply assumes that the economics of Brexit would be all downside and no upside. Alex Deane produced a splendid diatribe against this sleight-of-hand on this site yesterday.
If you doubt these voices from the Right – though remember that Fraser is a Remainer – then listen to Open Europe. Raoul Ruparel, its co-director, said that the report is “one-sided”. “It is a cost-benefit analysis of EU membership which looks at the benefits of EU membership and talks about the costs of leaving, but none of the benefits of leaving,” he said. “It is a strange combination.” Osborne replaced Treasury forecasts with OBR ones precisely because the former became discredited. If he himself didn’t take them seriously before, why does he do so now?
But what was striking about the Chancellor’s presentation was not its mendacity but its contemptuousness. Branding Leave campaigners “economically illiterate” was a V-sign flicked at the two in five Conservative MPs who back Brexit – the very people whose support he will need if he contests a Tory leadership contest. Perhaps he is prepared to sacrifice his ambitions for Remain. Or maybe he was simply unable yesterday to conceal his detestation of the Party’s Right – a wing that though far from identical with Conservative Leave supporters certainly overlaps with them.
There is doubtless a more sober explanation. Osborne’s leadership prospects have withered during the last six months. He has been forced to tear up his plans for tax credits, pensions and benefit reform. Last month, he plunged to the bottom of this site’s Cabinet League Table. Although he has many economic achievements under his belt – not least helping to produce a recovery which his critics said wouldn’t happen – he has missed his debt target, breached his welfare cap, and may well miss his surplus target target too.
The Chancellor is nothing if not a gambler – remember those inheritance tax and stamp duty pledges, thrown down on the table to ward off a 2007 election – and has doubtless calculated that only a thumping Remain victory can revive his leadership hopes. A Leave vote would doom them. A narrow Remain win would be scarcely better. Only the crushing of Leave can restore his authority and give him the time to rebuild his position. He can only – to use an unhappy phrase from his point of view – go for broke.
If Remain wins narrowly, don’t rule out Osborne quitting the front bench altogether, and preparing to leave the Commons altogether. He is still a young man and would be able to earn handsomely outside it, unencumbered by Parliament’s inconvenient reporting requirements. But it is hard to imagine this lover of the game simply chucking it in. He would be more likely to try to become in Government what Margaret Thatcher claimed to be after she was brought down: “a good back seat driver”.
That would mean ruling through a proxy, or striving to. Perhaps it would be a Remain supporter – such as Stephen Crabb, whose star is on the rise. More likely it would be the man who should now be Deputy Prime Minister, according to this site and its readers, and who though a fervent Leave campaigner has the respect of both sides.
That’s the old friend and ally who is busily laying into the Chancellor this morning, accusing him of treating voters “like children” (or, as Osborne himself used to say of Gordon Brown, “like fools”), and pointing out that the Treasury assumes immigration will rise by hundreds of thousands each year: Michael Gove.
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked
All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.
‘e’Mail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
With an avg. 1.2M voters per MEP & Britain having only 8%, if united, say. The EUropean Parliament has no ability to make policy and has a Commission of unelected bureaucrats, thus clearly the EU is not even a pretence of being a democracy; yet The EU & many of its vassal States are willing to slaughter people in Sovereign States to impose The EU’s chosen brand of democracy on them!
The imposition of a Government and policies upon its vassal regions such as the peoples of Greece shows just how far from being a democracy the EU is.
There will be little or no change in Britain’s economic position, when we leave the EU, using a better negotiated & updated version of the ‘Norway Model’ as a stepping stone to becoming a full member of the Eropean Economic Area, where all will benefit, as we secure trade relations with the EU’s vassal regions, with an EFTA style status and can trade and negotiate independently on the global stage, as members of The Commonwealth and the Anglosphere.One huge benefit will be that we can negotiate with bodies like the WTO, UN, WHO, IMF, CODEX and the like, directly in our own interest and that of our partners around the world in both the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere at large; rather than having negotiations and term imposed by unelected EU bureacrats and their ionterpretation of the rules handed down as if they were some great achievement by the EU.The greatest change and benefit will be political, as we improve our democracy and self determination, with the ability to deselect and elect our own Government, with an improved Westminster structure, see >Harrogate Agenda<.
Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com
UKIP Its ASSOCIATES & DETAILS: CLICK HERE
Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE
General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com
Documents, Essays & Treaties: https://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com/
The Hamlet of Stroat: http://Stroat-Gloucestershire.com
The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE
Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com
Chepstow Chat: http://ChepstowChat.wordpress.com/
Christopher Storey: http://ChristopherStory.wordpress.com/
Des Watkins DFC: http://DesWatkins.wordpress.com/
Hollie Greig etc.: http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com/
The McCann Case: http://TheMcCannCase.wordpress.com/
The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: http://SSOE.wordpress.com/
Stolen Kids, Dunblane: http://StolenKids-Dunblane.blogspot.com/
Stolen Kids, Bloggers: http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.co.uk/
- I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
- ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
- I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
- I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
- I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
- I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
- I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
- I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
- I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
- I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
- I am NOT a WARMIST
- I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
- I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
- I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
- I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
- I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
- I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
- I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
- I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
- I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
Re-TWEET my Twitterings