>Side Bars<
The Top Bar >PAGES<
Special counsel Mueller reportedly interested in Brexit boosters’ ties to Trump associates, Russia …

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins

eMail Address:

Blog About The Main Web Site:

The Main Web Site:



Special counsel Mueller reportedly interested in Brexit boosters’ ties to Trump associates, Russia

  • Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team is interested in a British businessman and his pro-Brexit associates’ contacts with Russian diplomats and Trump campaign operatives, The Washington Post reported.
  • Wealthy businessman Arron Banks reportedly met the Russian ambassador to London in August 2016, the Post reported.
  • Less than a week later, Banks and his associates traveled to attend a fundraiser in Mississippi, where they had been invited by then-campaign chief executive Steve Bannon.

Donald Trump, right, greets United Kingdom Independence Party leader Nigel Farage during a campaign rally at the Mississippi Coliseum on August 24, 2016 in Jackson, Mississippi.

Getty Images
Donald Trump, right, greets United Kingdom Independence Party leader Nigel Farage during a campaign rally at the Mississippi Coliseum on August 24, 2016 in Jackson, Mississippi.

Special counsel Robert Mueller‘s team is interested in a British businessman and his pro-Brexit associates’ contacts with Russian diplomats and Trump campaign operatives, The Washington Post reported, citing two people who were asked by Mueller about one of those associates.

That associate, Nigel Farage, was the leader of the UK Independence Party, or UKIP, and was one of the most prominent figures in the Brexit debate. The two people told the Post that Mueller’s investigators have asked them about Farage’s relationship to Trump associates during interviews as part of the ongoing probe into Russian meddling during the 2016 presidential election.

One member of the group of Britons, who called themselves the “Bad Boys of Brexit,” was Arron Banks, a wealthy businessman who donated millions to the campaign for Britain to leave the European Union.

Trump's White House has been a money-making machine

Trump’s White House has been a money-making machine  

Banks provided dozens of emails and text messages to the newspaper reportedly showing a friendly rapport between him and the Russian ambassador to London, Alexander Yakovenko, in 2016.

All the while, the Post reported Thursday, Banks and a clique of other Brexiteers were angling to become more deeply involved in Donald Trump‘s presidential campaign.

Spokespersons for Farage and the special counsel’s office did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment. Banks could not be reached for comment.

The report shines more light on Russia’s attempts to involve itself in major political events in the Western world as well as the willingness of key players in those events to respond favorably to Russian outreach.

In June 2016, for instance, ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, along with Trump’s son Donald Trump Jr. and his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, attended a meeting in Trump Tower with a Kremlin-connected lawyer whose intermediary had offered damaging information on Hillary Clinton.

After the stunning Brexit victory, in which Britain voted to leave the European Union, Banks reportedly met Yakovenko at the ambassador’s residence. A few days later, Banks and his associates traveled to attend a fundraiser in Mississippi, where they had been invited by then-campaign chief executive Steve Bannon.

Banks and Farage both told the Post that they had not been contacted by Mueller’s team. Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani told the newspaper that he had not heard anything about Yakovenko and that he had not been asked about it by Mueller. A spokesperson for Giuliani did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The simultaneous communications with Russian officials and Trump campaign members have also come to the attention of investigators in the United Kingdom, the Post reported.

To view the original article CLICK HERE

How the ‘Bad Boys of Brexit’ forged ties with Russia and the Trump campaign — and came under investigators’ scrutiny

by Manuel Roig-Franzia, Rosalind S. Helderman, William Booth and Tom Hamburger June 28

What do the ‘Bad Boys of Brexit’ have to do with Trump?

Three British men who played major roles in the Brexit vote had several meetings with a Russian Ambassador sometimes days before meeting with Trump’s campaign. (Video: Joyce Koh/Photo: (Wigmore/Finn/WENN)/The Washington Post)

BRISTOL, England — On Aug. 19, 2016, Arron Banks, a wealthy British businessman, sat down at the palatial residence of the Russian ambassador to London for a lunch of wild halibut and Belevskaya pastila apple sweets accompanied by Russian white wine.

Banks had just scored a huge win. From relative obscurity, he had become the largest political donor in British history by pouring millions into Brexit, the campaign to disentangle the United Kingdom from the European Union that had earned a jaw-dropping victory at the polls two months earlier.

Now he had something else that bolstered his standing as he sat down with his new Russian friend, Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko: his team’s deepening ties to Donald Trump’s insurgent presidential bid in the United States. A major Brexit supporter, Stephen K. Bannon, had just been installed as chief executive of Trump’s campaign. And Banks and his fellow Brexiteers had been invited to attend a fundraiser with Trump in Mississippi.

Less than a week after the meeting with the Russian envoy, Banks and firebrand Brexit politician Nigel Farage — by then a cult hero among some anti-establishment Trump supporters — were huddling privately with the Republican nominee in Jackson, Miss., where Farage wowed a foot-stomping crowd at a Trump rally.

Banks’s journey from a lavish meal with a Russian diplomat in London to the raucous heart of Trump country was part of an unusual intercontinental charm offensive by the wealthy British donor and his associates, a hard-partying lot who dubbed themselves the “Bad Boys of Brexit.” Their efforts to simultaneously cultivate ties to Russian officials and Trump’s campaign have captured the interest of investigators in the United Kingdom and the United States, including special counsel Robert S. Mueller III.

Both inquiries center on questions of Russia’s involvement in seismic political events that have shaken the world order, with the European Union losing a key member and U.S. voters electing a president critical of Washington’s traditional alliances.

[Trump associate Roger Stone reveals new contact with Russian national during 2016 campaign]

In Britain, recent revelations about Banks’s Russian contacts have triggered scrutiny of whether the Russians sought to bolster the Brexit effort. In the U.S., congressional Democrats who recently obtained a trove of Banks’s communications have begun exploring a different question: Did the Brexit leaders serve as a conduit between the Kremlin and Trump’s operation?

Banks rejected the notion that he was a go-between, insisting his contacts were routine business and diplomatic exchanges — and that the investigations are a “witch hunt.” But he acknowledged that the interactions raised reasonable questions about whether the Brexiteers were “a back channel to the Russians,” as he put it.

“The only problem with all of that is that not one shred of evidence has been produced. . . . It doesn’t go anywhere,” Banks said in one of two interviews with The Washington Post in Bristol this week.

Asked whether Russians had been probing them or seeking to win influence or intelligence, Banks conceded, “They may have. But if so, it wasn’t a very good probe.”

Throughout the 2016 campaign, the wealthy insurance executive built a first-name rapport with the Russian ambassador as Banks briefed him on the breakaway campaign — exchanging frequent, chummy texts and emails, and meeting with him in person four times in about 12 months, according to Banks. At the same time, he and other Brexit backers also intently pursued entree to Trump’s world, according to interviews and dozens of emails and text messages Banks provided to The Post.
Texts between Brexit donor Arron Banks and Russian Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko.

As both relationships deepened, Banks and his associates discussed Trump’s bid and the U.S. presidential campaign with Yakovenko, the Brexit backers acknowledge. At least two of the meetings between Banks and the ambassador came shortly before or after meetings with Trump.

In recent weeks, British parliamentary investigators have sought information about Banks’s relationship to Russia and allegations that he was offered financial inducements, including a potentially lucrative gold-mine deal with a Russian businessman he met through the Russian ambassador.

The interactions between the Brexit leaders and the Trump campaign have also drawn the interest of Mueller as part of his investigation into Russia’s interference in the 2016 campaign, which is examining contacts between Trump associates and Russians.

Two people — former Trump communications official Michael Caputo and another person, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing investigation — told The Post that Mueller’s investigators asked about Farage’s relationship to Trump associates in witness interviews this year, including Caputo just last month.

A spokesman for the special counsel declined to comment.

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats are examining the role of the Brexit leaders after a whistleblower gave a cache of documents detailing Banks’s interactions with the Russian ambassador to members of the House Intelligence Committee earlier this month, according to three lawmakers on the panel.

Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the top Democrat on the committee, said he has questions about whether Banks and his associates “served as a conduit of information to and from the Russians on behalf of the Trump campaign.” Another committee member, Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Tex.) said the material “opens a whole new chapter” in the ongoing inquiry into Russian efforts to intervene in the 2016 U.S. election.

A White House spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. Bannon, who led Trump’s campaign in the final months of the 2016 race, declined to comment.

Trump’s lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, said he was not aware of any questions from Mueller about the Brexit backers and had seen nothing about the topic in documents he has reviewed. “I never heard anything about the Russian ambassador [to London] nor have I ever talked to the president about this,” he said.

Farage and Banks said they have not been contacted by Mueller’s investigators and disputed the idea that they ferried information for the Trump campaign or the Kremlin.

“There seems to be a culture of throwing hysterical accusations around without any evidence whatsoever,” Farage said in an email response to questions.

Banks said he and his fellow Brexit leaders have sought to be transparent about their dealings with Russia. Shortly after Trump’s election, he said, they reached out to officials from the U.S. Embassy in London in the wake of a report suggesting they were pro-Russian actors.

Banks said he and Farage each met once with American embassy officials to describe their contacts. Their associate Andrew Wigmore said he sat down with U.S. diplomats five or six times and turned over numerous documents.

A spokesman for the U.S. Embassy in London confirmed that leaders of the Brexit movement met with American diplomats, including Thomas E. William, a top political officer at the State Department, but declined to discuss the subject of the meeting.

Banks said he was releasing documents to The Post to show he has nothing to hide, and he said he would be happy to speak to Mueller.

“We had so much fun at a parliamentary select committee,” he said, referring to his recent appearance before British lawmakers. “We’d love to be called in.”
Brexit backer Arron Banks, left, and Andrew Wigmore in London on June 12. (Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)

The connections between the men who would become the Bad Boys of Brexit and Trump’s future inner campaign circle stretch back to 2013, when Farage said he first met Bannon — then at the helm of the far-right website Breitbart. The conservative media executive quickly bonded with the populist politician, who at the time was leading the UK Independence Party, an anti-immigration, make-Britain-great-again force that helped fuel a backlash against the European Union.

Soon, the Brexit leaders also began to forge Russian ties.

In the fall of 2015, during UKIP’s annual convention at the Doncaster racecourse several hours north of London, Wigmore, a Farage confidant, met a Russian diplomat named Alexander Udod, who then helped arrange a lunch for the UKIP leaders with the Russian ambassador, Yakovenko. (Udod was one of 23 suspected Russian intelligence officers ejected from Britain this year after the nerve agent attack against Sergei Skripal, a Russian double agent, and his adult daughter, in Salisbury in south England.)

Banks and Wigmore said they were interested not only in briefing the Russians on Brexit, but also in seeking possible Russian backers for their various offshore investments, including banana plantations in Belize.

In November 2015, the two men had what they describe as a “6-hour boozy lunch” at Yakovenko’s fashionable residence in London.

The two men briefed the ambassador on their Brexit plans, but Yakovenko seemed most interested in hearing stories about Wigmore’s father, who had been involved in one of the last Britain-Russia spy swaps, Banks said.

Over tea at the ambassador’s house a few days later, Yakovenko introduced Banks to a Russian businessman, who pitched him on a potentially lucrative merger of six gold mines. Banks passed on the opportunity, he said, months before the Brexit vote was scheduled.

“I’m a businessman. . . . Why wouldn’t I?” Banks said of his willingness to consider the deal, saying it had nothing to do with Brexit or Trump.
Russian Ambassador Alexander Yakovenko arrives for a news conference at his residence in London on April 13. (Kirsty Wigglesworth/Associated Press)

Reports in The Times of London, The Guardian and its Sunday paper, The Observer, about the proposed gold-mine deal and some of the correspondence between the Brexit backers and the Russians have prompted questions in Britain about whether the proposal might have been a way to route Russian money into the Brexit campaign or compromise its backers.

Wigmore, who also served in a diplomatic post with the High Commission of Belize in London, said his main goal at the lunch was not to talk about Brexit, but to help find a buyer for a large Belizean banana plantation whose owner had been designated as a drug kingpin, effectively preventing the farming operation from major international markets.

“In hindsight,” Wigmore said, “it looks more ridiculous than it actually sounds.”

The Russian embassy in London did not respond to requests for comment, but it has denied that it had any involvement in Brexit.

“The Russian embassy has not in any way intervened in the domestic UK political process, including the Brexit referendum,” the embassy told The Observer. “Meeting stakeholders representing all political spectrum of the host country is a natural element of the work of any embassy.”

After the initial encounters, the Brexiteers were quickly on a first-name basis with the ambassador.

“Dear Alexander,” Banks wrote in a text message the day after their lunch. “Firstly many thanks for the hospitality. I thoroughly enjoyed myself. Beautiful wine and food.”

He went on to invite the ambassador to his “Old Down” manor home in the countryside, a sprawling estate and country park with gorgeous views and llamas. Banks said the visit never took place.

“At the time, the Russians weren’t considered the baddies at all,” Wigmore said. “In London, everyone was engaging with the Russians.”

Indeed, in the months to come, George Papadopoulos — one of then-candidate Trump’s volunteer foreign policy advisers who is now cooperating with Mueller’s probe — also sought a meeting with Yakovenko. In March 2016, according to emails and U.S. court records, Papadopoulos unsuccessfully worked to land an introduction to the Russian ambassador through a London-based professor and other Russian contacts.

Around that time, Farage’s movement suffered a blow in Britain, losing a competition to be the official government-financed campaign urging people to vote to leave the E.U.

So he and his allies struck out on their own, funded by Banks, an insurance and mining magnate. He ended up putting 9 million British pounds into the campaign, Banks said. The effort was boosted by enthusiastic support from Bannon’s Breitbart, which by then had launched a Britain edition and was promoting Farage and the long-shot Brexit initiative with vigor.

On June 23, 2016, the Brexit forces eked out a victory. Suddenly, Farage was an international celebrity. The following month, Farage — who had stepped down from his UKIP leadership post — and his associates attended the Republican National Convention in Cleveland. There, they were greeted as conquering heroes and began to make inroads into Trump’s campaign.

One night during the convention, Farage was introduced to Trump’s longtime adviser, the infamous political trickster Roger Stone, at an Italian restaurant, according to both men. Stone, who was accompanied that night by the Internet radio host and conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, said Farage’s main goal appeared to be to get a meeting with Trump.

The next day, Stone said, he tried to help by calling his former business partner, Paul Manafort — then Trump’s campaign chairman — and suggesting that the Republican nominee get together with Farage. Manafort’s response was something along the lines of, “I’ll put a good word in,” Stone recalled.

It was another encounter, however, that would get Farage and his allies the Trump meeting they wanted.

On the last night of the convention, Wigmore and Farage wandered into the bar at the Hilton Hotel, where they ran into a rowdy group of staffers for Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant (R).

“They were in­cred­ibly drunk. And the assistant to the governor said, ‘Look, if we invite you to Mississippi, would you come?’ ” Wigmore recalled in an interview. “Of course, we said, ‘Yes, of course,’ not thinking it would be followed up. But it was.”

In an emailed statement, Bryant said: “I admired the Brexit movement from afar two years ago. I believe the same principles that drove Brexit contributed to President Trump being elected. Both events restored hope to the forgotten men and women.”

The Brexiteers returned to London upbeat about the prospects of more closely aligning their movement with Trump’s. Less than a month later, their ties to his operation were further cemented when Farage’s biggest American booster — Bannon — was installed at the helm of Trump’s campaign.

Two days after the Bannon announcement, Wigmore and Banks lunched with the Russian ambassador and discussed Trump’s prospects and their upcoming trip to Mississippi.

“We had no idea that we would meet [Trump], but I’m sure we would have told the Ambassador we were going,” Wigmore said in an email to The Post. “I do remember him stating that he did not think [Trump] had a chance of winning and you may remember at the time Trump was 10 points down in the polls and the attacks on him were full on.”

Less than a week later, in Mississippi, Wigmore said Farage met Trump for the first time at a high-dollar fundraiser for the GOP campaign in Jackson.

Afterward, Trump invited the Brexiteers to a campaign rally and asked Farage to speak on stage.

“Trump says, ‘I’ll come on stage, I’ll speak for a few minutes, then I’ll introduce you. You speak for six minutes, and then I’ll carry on. Are you okay with that?’ ” Wigmore recalled.

Soon, Farage had the hyped-up crowd on its feet.

“If I was an American citizen, I wouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton if you paid me. In fact, I wouldn’t vote for Hillary Clinton if SHE paid me,” Farage told an audience that roared its approval. “Folks, the message is clear, the parallels are there. . . . Remember, anything is possible if enough decent people are prepared to stand up against the establishment.”
Former UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage joins then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump at an August 2016 campaign rally in Jackson, Miss. (Jonathan Bachman/Getty Images)

From then on, Farage and his cohorts became almost de-facto Trump campaign surrogates. They attended presidential debates in St. Louis and Las Vegas and a rally in Michigan. When the campaign was rocked by The Washington Post’s report on a videotape in which Trump bragged about groping women, Farage went on Fox News to defend him. “He’s not running to be Pope,” Farage declared.

On Nov. 12, 2016 — four days after Trump was elected president — Farage and his colleagues decided on a whim to pay a visit to Trump Tower in New York.

They arrived at the building without an appointment or an invitation, Wigmore said, and Farage called his pal Bannon, who responded: “Yeah, obviously, come along and see me.”

The whole retinue of Brits ended up in a lengthy meeting with the president-elect, whom Banks described as “very un-Trump-like” that day, “very relaxed, open-neck shirt . . . very reflective.”

“He wanted to talk to Nigel about what it felt like when he finished the Brexit campaign, and it was a very mellow kind of conversation,” Banks said.

Eventually, Farage — the first foreign visitor hosted by the president-elect — would take a now famous photo with a smiling Trump, Banks and Wigmore in front of the building’s gilded elevator.

During their visit, the Brexiteers got a glimpse of Trump’s chaotic operation, listening with amusement as harried staffers argued over who should be named White House chief of staff, Banks said.

At one point, Wigmore said, a secretary standing outside the office blurted out: “You’re British. Do you have a number for Number 10?” — a reference to the British prime minister’s home at 10 Downing Street. In fact, Banks did. But he wanted something in return, and Trump’s staff was happy to oblige: a good telephone number for Trump’s presidential transition office.

A few days later, after Banks had returned to London, he and Wigmore sat down again for tea with Yakovenko, the Russian ambassador — their fourth meeting in a year.

The Russians “were utterly gobsmacked that Trump had won,” Banks said.

Wigmore had been handing out the Trump transition team’s telephone number to all sorts of diplomats from various countries, he said. So when the Russian ambassador asked for the number, he said he happily obliged.

Wigmore said he was “not thinking there was anything remotely sinister” in sharing information he had learned at Trump Tower with the Russian diplomat. “Why would I?”
Former UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, center, at Trump Tower in New York on Nov. 12, 2016, where he met with President-elect Donald Trump. (Yana Paskova/Getty Images)

Booth reported from Bristol, England, and London. Craig Timberg, Alice Crites, Josh Dawsey and Julie Tate in Washington and Karla Adam in Bristol contributed to this report.

To view the Full Washington Post Article CLICK HERE




Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins
tel: 44 (0)1594 – 528 337
Calls from ‘Number Withheld’ phones Are Blocked

All unanswered messages are recorded.
Leave your name & a UK land line number & I will return your call.

‘e’Mail Address:


With an avg. 1.2M voters per MEP & Britain with 16% of EU GDP and 13% of the EU’s population yet  having only 8% (if united) say, whilst holding less than 3% of the various offices within the EU Do note The EUropean Parliament has no ability to make policy and has a Commission of unelected bureaucrats, thus clearly the EU is not even a pretence of being a democracy despite its protestations!
Do note that many senior apparatchicks and even elected politicians speak openly of the ‘Post Democratic era’ with no sense of shame or irony and in complete contempt of the so called electorate – yet The EU & many of its vassal States/Regions are all too willing to slaughter people in Sovereign States, to impose The EU’s chosen brand of democracy on them!

Now as President Junker announced in his ‘State of the union’ speech 2017 the aim is to create an EU military force and centralise ever more of the decision making and control!

The imposition of a Government and policies upon its vassal regions such as the peoples of Greece shows just how far from being a democracy the EU is.

Just follow the recent EU display of so called ‘Democracy’:
France and the Netherlands voted against the proposed EU constitution in 2005, only to have those votes ignored.
Ireland voted against ratifying the Lisbon treaty in 2008, but then later under pressure & threats had to change its mind.
Greece for me was the final straw. It became clear in 2015 that it didn’t matter which way the Greek people voted. The birthplace of democracy had become its tomb. That was enough. I was going to vote to leave the EU when the chance came.

No political party of any significance in Britain took active steps to achieve a Referendum – the task was eventually taken by an Indipendent West Midlands MEP Nikki Sinclaire who personally launched and funded the gathering of a petition of 225,000 signatures delivered to Parliament via Downing Street, thus forcing a debate in the House of Commons on an IN/OUT Referendum, which led to David Cameron’s first consequential rebellion.

It was due to winning that debate, officially opposed by every party including Ukip that David Cameron was forced to include a promise of an IN/OUT Referendum in the Tory Manifesto at the next General Election. The rest is history & despite no Parliamentary Party backing the OUT vote & Government spending Millions of Pounds of public money leafletting & promoting ‘Project Fear’ to try to persuade the British people to Remain just as they had at the first Referendum in 1975 – This time their lies and threats were not heeded and in the largest vote in British history Britain voted by a clear majority to Leave.

Nikki Sinclaire’s OUT result left Cameron & his co conspirator Osborne with no option but to resign, sadly some of the other traitors have remained to try to hinder progress to BreXit, aided by their corrupt allies in the EU and \eu funding and bribes!

There will be little or no change in Britain’s economic position, if we leave the EU, using a better negotiated, customised & updated version of the ‘Norway Model’ as a stepping stone to becoming a full member of the Eropean Economic Area, where all will benefit, as we secure trade relations with the EU’s vassal regions, with an EFTA style status and can trade and negotiate independently on the global stage, as members of The Commonwealth and the Anglosphere.

This is of course dependent on a modicum of intelligence on the part of Britain’s politicians and negotiators but it also requires the integrity of Parliament to uphod democracy and the integrity of EU politicuians & apparchicks to act ethically and without their normal vindictive mallice.

I believe Leaving the EU will be turned into something of a rough ride by the ignorant and the corrupt but I have no doubt that in the long run Leaving the EU will prove conclusively to be in the best interests of Britain and our true allies. I also believe that Britain leaving the EU will prove to be the catalyst to great changes within the EU and hopefully its democratisation as without great changes it is indubitably doomed.

Do not overlook the fact that politicians have plotted and schemmed since the 1950s and we have actually been vassals of the EU, when it was still using the aesopian linguistics and calling itself The Common Market in the early 1970s, a name the bureaucrats arbitrarily changed to EUropean Union in the early 1990s as they worked towards their long term goals of an ever closer centrally controlled Political and economic Union with its own anthem, currency, flag and rigid central control by its self appointed bureacrats towards a new Empirate –

It will take many years to rectify the mess our political class got us into and we have no other peacefull means by which to extricate ourselves than to depend on that self same self styled elite, who all too often forget they work for us!

One huge benefit of BreXit will be that we can negotiate with bodies like the WTO, UN, WHO, IMF, CODEX and the like, directly, in our own interest and that of our partners around the world, in both the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere at large; rather than having negotiations and terms imposed by unelected EU bureacrats and their interpretation of the rules handed down, as if they were some great achievement of the EU’s!
The greatest change and benefit will be political, as we improve our democracy and self determination, with the ability to deselect and elect our own Government, with an improved Westminster structure, see >Harrogate Agenda<.
How we go about the process of disentangling our future wellbeing from the EU is laid out in extensive, well researched and immensely tedious detail see >FleXcit< or for a brief video summary CLICK HERE


>Side Bars<
The Top Bar >PAGES<Also:

You will find me on both Skype & Twitter but I do not utilise the attrociously regulated FaceBook nor similar social media.

Skype: GregL-W

You are encouraged to contact me with information or to effect a correction on any of my postings – BUT I only respond to individuals providing a verifiable name, address and land line telephone.
  1. I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
  2. ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
  3. I DO NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
  4. I DO NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
  5. I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
  6. I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
  7. I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
  8. I DO NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
  9. I REGRET due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
  10. I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
  11. I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
  13. I DO NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
  14. I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
  15. I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR, Thorium & Psi/Si technologies
  16. I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
  17. I DO NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
  18. I VALUE the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
  19. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
  20. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
  21. I BELIEVE in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
  22. I DO NOT trust or believe in armed police
  23. I DO NOT believe in prolonging human life beyond reasonable expectation of sentient participatory intellectual existence
  24. I BELIEVE in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms
  25. I DO TRY to make every effort to NOT infringe copyrights in any commercial way & make all consequential corrections of fact brought to my attention by an identifiable individual

Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.

Re-TWEET my Tweets

& Publicise My Blogs
To Spread The Facts World Wide

Posted by:
Greg Lance – Watkins

eMail Address:

Blog About The Main Web Site:

The Main Web Site: