‘Vote Leave’ & ‘Leave EU’: Merger Talks Between The Rivals Have Collapsed


Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.



Isabel Oakeshott is co-author with Lord Ashcroft of Call Me Dave.

It may be the season of goodwill, but the prospect of the two rival Brexit campaigns kissing under the mistletoe now looks less likely than a white Christmas.

Tentative talks between Vote Leave and Leave.eu have collapsed amid continuing mistrust between the key players. It means they will compete with each other all the way to the finishing line next year, when the Electoral Commission will be forced to designate one or the other as the official campaign.

Representatives from Leave.eu and Vote Leave recently met to discuss how they might be able to work together. It followed a formal overture from Arron Banks, the multimillionaire businessman behind Leave.eu. Writing to Matthew Elliott, chief executive of Vote Leave, last month, Banks had declared that he had “no prior conditions” for a merger. Following this gesture, the Board of Vote Leave felt it would be churlish not to hear him out.

Present at the confidential talks, held at a neutral location, were Banks himself, Leave.eu co-chairman Richard Tice, Vote Leave’s Treasurer John Mills, and Vote Leave’s director Daniel Hodson.

During what is described as a “cordial” meeting, Mills and Hodson were frank about their reservations. They cited what they see as Banks’ “erratic” behaviour and his determination to put immigration at the heart of the Brexit campaign as key barriers to a full merger. They also raised the thorny question of the role to be played by Nigel Farage, over which the rival campaigns disagree. (Vote Leave believes Farage is too divisive and politically damaged to lead the campaign, whereas leave.eu believes he must be at the forefront.)

Despite the sensitive personal nature of some of these questions, insiders say there was a positive atmosphere. It is understood that Banks acknowledged that Elliott has better Westminster connections and is a more effective political operator than himself. (His own political experience is limited to his dealings with UKIP, to which he donated £1 million in 2014.) The businessman indicated that he was ready to let Elliott, who founded the TaxPayers’ Alliance and (along with another of Vote Leave’s treasurers, City financier and philanthropist Peter Cruddas) ran the successful No To AV campaign during the Coalition, front the political campaign.

A source close to Banks said: “Arron knows that Matthew is better at political schmoozing. He suggested that Matthew do the geeky political stuff, and we focus on the mass marketing; the ground campaign. “

While the Vote Leave camp continued to play down the prospect of a formal merger, various ways in which the two campaigns could co-operate were discussed. It ended amicably, with a further meeting mooted.

To the surprise and dismay of Vote Leave however, the day after the crunch talks, Banks emailed Elliott declaring that he did not wish to hold any further discussions. The missive brought the flirtation to an abrupt end.

What happened? Quite simply, personalities. Banks has a problem working with various figures in Vote Leave, the latest of which is Campaign Director, Dominic Cummings. He considers Cummings counterproductive to the cause.

It is true that Michael Gove’s former special adviser is divisive – so much so that when the Tories entered government in 2010, David Cameron’s then director of communications Andy Coulson vetoed his appointment as a special adviser. In a vicious character assassination CLICK HERE last month, the lefty polemicist Nick Cohen labelled him “the most self-aggrandising and destructive agitator the modern Tory party has produced” and suggested that he could “wreck” the campaign to persuade British voters to back leaving the EU. Having once been at the sharp end of Cohen’s poisonous pen myself, I know his harrumphing should be kept in perspective, but he is right that Cummings’ uncompromising style can alienate sensitive types.

The irony is that Cummings is nowhere near as divisive as Banks himself. The diplomatic Elliott has done his best, but a number of donors – and potential donors – have apparently told him in no uncertain terms that they want nothing to do with the Bristol-based businessman.

Banks knows all this and claims he is willing to take “half a step back” in the interests of a merger. However, he is not prepared to “leave the room completely.” And half a step is not enough for Vote Leave.

Thus it is stalemate.

During last week’s talks, Tice suggested that if the two campaigns came together, a new Board could be established to oversee the running of the joint operation – or rather, to keep the peace. If this sensible move had been suggested six months ago, perhaps it would have worked. It is now too late.

While Elliott remains quietly confident his campaign will secure the official designation, Banks shows no sign of walking away. The energetic businessman believes his good name has been “blackened” as a result of the long running tussle, and wants to set people straight. In the New Year he will embark on a charm offensive to persuade people that he has been misrepresented. He believes it won’t take much to win over his critics.

A friend says: “Arron is finding that people who have heard a lot about him but never actually met him are pleasantly surprised to find he doesn’t have three heads. He believes that all the briefing against him is actually quite helpful in that respect.”

For his part, Elliott is keeping his head down. To borrow a phrase favoured by government ministers when they are under pressure, he is “just getting on with the job.” In the war of attrition, he has yet to play all his cards.

For all those who want the “out” campaign to morph into the mighty machine that will be required to persuade an intrinsically cautious electorate to back Brexit, the failure of the two camps to come together is a big disappointment. Unless there is a last minute détente, either Banks or Elliott is going to be badly burned. When the story of the referendum is written, any evidence that the outcome was adversely affected by their failure to work together will mean history is less kind to both men.


To view the original of this article CLICK HERE




Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

Tel: 01594 – 528 337
number witheld calls are blocked
& calls are recorded.

eMail Address: Greg_L-W@BTconnect.com
With an avg. 1.2M voters per MEP & Britain having only 8%, if united, say. The EUropean Parliament has no ability to make policy and has a Commission of unelected bureaucrats, thus clearly the EU is not even a pretence of being a democracy; yet The EU & many of its vassal States are willing to slaughter people in Sovereign States to impose The EU’s chosen brand of democracy on them!

The imposition of a Government and policies upon its vassal regions such as the peoples of Greece shows just how far from being a democracy the EU is.

There will be little or no change in Britain’s economic position, when we leave the EU, using a better negotiated & updated version of the ‘Norway Model’ as a stepping stone to becoming a full member of the Eropean Economic Area, where all will benefit, as we secure trade relations with the EU’s vassal regions, with an EFTA style status and can trade and negotiate independently on the global stage, as members of The Commonwealth and the Anglosphere.

One huge benefit will be that we can negotiate with bodies like the WTO, UN, WHO, IMF, CODEX and the like, directly in our own interest and that of our partners around the world in both the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere at large; rather than having negotiations and term imposed by unelected EU bureacrats and their ionterpretation of the rules handed down as if they were some great achievement by the EU.
The greatest change and benefit will be political, as we improve our democracy and self determination, with the ability to deselect and elect our own Government, with an improved Westminster structure, see >Harrogate Agenda<.
How we go about the process of disentangling our future wellbeing from the EU is laid out in extensive, well researched and immensely tedious detail see >FleXcit< or for a brief video summary CLICK HERE
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
& >Side Bars<
& The Top Bar >PAGES<Also:

Details & Links: http://GregLanceWatkins.com

Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE

General ‘Stuff’: http://GL-W.com


Documents, Essays & Treaties: https://GLWdocuments.wordpress.com/

The Hamlet of Stroat: http://Stroat-Gloucestershire.com

The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE

Health Blog.: http://GregLW.com

Chepstow Chat: http://ChepstowChat.wordpress.com/

Christopher Storey: http://ChristopherStory.wordpress.com/

Des Watkins DFC: http://DesWatkins.wordpress.com/

Hollie Greig etc.: http://HollieGreigetc.wordpress.com/

Psycheocracy: http://Psycheocracy.wordpress.com/

The McCann Case: http://TheMcCannCase.wordpress.com/

The Speculative Society of Edinburgh: http://SSOE.wordpress.com/

Stolen Kids, Dunblane: http://StolenKids-Dunblane.blogspot.com/

Stolen Kids, Bloggers: http://stolenkids-bloggers.blogspot.co.uk/

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP: http://UKIP-vs-EUkip.com

Skype: GregL-W


Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
& Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide,

& To Leave-The-EU  


  • I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
  • ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
  • I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
  • I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
  • I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
  • I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
  • I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
  • I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
  • I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
  • I am NOT a WARMIST
  • I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
  • I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
  • I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
  • I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
  • I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
  • I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
  • I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
  • I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms