The Cabinet’s Eurosceptics are a bunch of careerist scaredy cats


Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins – Greg_L-W.


The Cabinet’s Eurosceptics are a bunch of careerist scaredy cats


This is the weekly newsletter from Iain Martin, editor of CapX. To receive it by email every Friday, along with a short daily email of our top five stories, please subscribe here.

The way in which the Tory high command continually confuses its own interests and the progress of the UK’s EU referendum campaign is becoming steadily more annoying. Immersed in governing, pleased as punch with their election win (delivered by Lynton Crosby) and beyond delighted that Labour has chosen suicide over recovery, the EU vote is talked of by leadership loyalists as though it is about the future of Cameron and Osborne rather than the future of the country.

But Britain’s looming vote on the EU is not – or should not be – politics as normal. It is a historic moment, in which the UK will decide to take one of two quite different paths. Party management and careers matter, of course, but sometimes there are choices that should be about something more than the mere game of politics. The EU referendum is one such event.

In that light, the timidity to date of Eurosceptics (and former Eurosceptics) within the Cabinet is quite astonishing. Chris Grayling, Leader of the House, is the only member of the cabinet to indicate so far that he will vote to leave the EU, and Northern Ireland Secretary Theresa Villiers has been pushing Cameron behind the scenes, convincing him that he had to allow ministers the right to campaign for either side when the formal campaign starts. But that’s about it. Others are said to be considering their options, although it is quite possible that Leave will end up with only Grayling, Iain Duncan Smith and Theresa Villiers, when there are plenty more Eurosceptic ministers in the government. What will the scaredy cats do during the campaign? Do they propose to go into hiding or will they parrot lines prepared for them by the Tory leadership? How will this look on television? How will the Outers for In look at themselves in the mirror afterwards?

Two leading Tories – big beast Michael Gove and trainee big beast Sajid Javid – are said to be weighing up their options, although neither at this stage looks likely to break for Out, which leads me to wonder what they are so scared of. Gove is close friends with Cameron and Osborne, of course, and one can understand the difficulty he finds himself in. Javid has the possibility of being Osborne’s Chancellor when the great takeover eventually happens…

It is all such short-term nonsense, which reminds me of the hilarious way Gordon Brown’s allies used to say in 2006-2007 that you had better get on side because Gordon was going to own the future. Where is Gordon now?

Ministers, it is make your mind up time. Although David Cameron’s renegotiation with the EU for new membership terms could have been the real deal, it is clear that it will deliver very little. It is In or Out, probably as soon as this summer. For that reason, ministers need to do something that is highly unfashionable and considered downright deranged in the British Establishment: decide what you believe – enthusiastically for In, reluctantly for In, or Out because you think it is best for your country – and get ready to fight for it at public meetings across the land. Don’t be scared. You are grown men and women. You might even be surprised how much voters like politicians saying what they believe rather than what is convenient for their careers.

This argument is – I know – a stretch, considering how careerist politics has become. But for anyone playing a leading role in the affairs of a nation to base such a vital decision purely on career progression or fear of friends is not only wrong, it’s pathetic. And in ten years time, none of it, all the hedging and game-playing, will matter a jot. By then David Cameron will be having a snooze after lunch in rural Oxfordshire. Osborne will be running the World Bank or a hedge fund. The decision on the EU, on the other hand, now that will have mattered a lot.

To view the original of this article CLICK HERE

Iain Martin is Editor of CapX




Posted by: Greg Lance-Watkins

Tel: 01594 – 528 337
number witheld calls are blocked
& calls are recorded.

eMail Address:
With an avg. 1.2M voters per MEP & Britain having only 8%, if united, say. The EUropean Parliament has no ability to make policy and has a Commission of unelected bureaucrats, thus clearly the EU is not even a pretence of being a democracy; yet The EU & many of its vassal States are willing to slaughter people in Sovereign States to impose The EU’s chosen brand of democracy on them!

The imposition of a Government and policies upon its vassal regions such as the peoples of Greece shows just how far from being a democracy the EU is.

There will be little or no change in Britain’s economic position, when we leave the EU, using a better negotiated & updated version of the ‘Norway Model’ as a stepping stone to becoming a full member of the Eropean Economic Area, where all will benefit, as we secure trade relations with the EU’s vassal regions, with an EFTA style status and can trade and negotiate independently on the global stage, as members of The Commonwealth and the Anglosphere.

One huge benefit will be that we can negotiate with bodies like the WTO, UN, WHO, IMF, CODEX and the like, directly in our own interest and that of our partners around the world in both the Commonwealth and the Anglosphere at large; rather than having negotiations and term imposed by unelected EU bureacrats and their ionterpretation of the rules handed down as if they were some great achievement by the EU.
The greatest change and benefit will be political, as we improve our democracy and self determination, with the ability to deselect and elect our own Government, with an improved Westminster structure, see >Harrogate Agenda<.
How we go about the process of disentangling our future wellbeing from the EU is laid out in extensive, well researched and immensely tedious detail see >FleXcit< or for a brief video summary CLICK HERE
Accuracy & Copyright Statement: CLICK HERE
& >Side Bars<
& The Top Bar >PAGES<Also:

Details & Links:

Views I respect & almost Totally Share: CLICK HERE

General ‘Stuff’:

Documents, Essays & Treaties:

The Hamlet of Stroat:

The Study of a Wind Turbine Application: CLICK HERE

Health Blog.:

Chepstow Chat:

Christopher Storey:

Des Watkins DFC:

Hollie Greig etc.:


The McCann Case:

The Speculative Society of Edinburgh:

Stolen Kids, Dunblane:

Stolen Kids, Bloggers:

Summary, archive, facts & comments on UKIP:

Skype: GregL-W


Please Be Sure To
.Follow Greg_LW on Twitter.
& Re-TWEET my Twitterings
& Publicise My Blogs 

To Spread The Facts World Wide,

& To Leave-The-EU  


  • I NEVER post anonymously on the internet
  • ALL MY BLOGS & WEB SITES are clearly sourced to me
  • I do NOT use an obfuscated eMail address to hide behind
  • I do NOT use or bother reading FaceBook
  • I DO have a Voice Mail Message System
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to answer identifiable eMails
  • I ONLY GUARANTEE to phone back identifiable UK Land Line Messages
  • I do NOT accept phone calls from witheld numbers
  • I Regret due to BT in this area I have a rubbish Broadband connection
  • I AM opposed to British membership of The EU
  • I AM opposed to Welsh, Scottish or English Independence within an interdependent UK
  • I am NOT a WARMIST
  • I do NOT believe the IPCC Climate Propaganda re Anthropogenic Global Warming
  • I AM strongly opposed to the subsidy or use of failed technologies eg. WIND TURBINES
  • I AM IN FAVOUR of rapid research & development of NEW NUCLEAR technologies
  • I see no evidence to trust POLITICIANS at any level or of any persuasion
  • I do NOT believe in GODS singular or plural, Bronze Age or Modern
  • I value the NHS as a HEALTH SERVICE NOT a Lifestyle support
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial or GBH rape.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial, terrorist, mass or for pleasure murder.
  • I believe in a DEATH PENALTY for serial gross child abuse including sexual.
  • I do NOT trust or believe in armed police
  • I believe in EUTHENASIA under clearly defined & legal terms